World Cup Blog: Man cover from Spain! The German national team is not - Holland now faces the difficult task of defeating the seemingly invincible at the moment again Iberians. The Kraken oracle While it is certain that Germany wins third place and Spain wins the Cup. (
Even the English press takes notice! In Spain, the final oracle even broadcast live and the English observers chanted "Campeones, Campeones," as if the finale already played!)
This all seems clear. But you should really a slippery cephalopods leave the decision about who will win the World Cup? Even if the Oberhauser octopus during the 2010 World Cup with his tips was always right - if the whole thing with the octopus-oracle too seriously, you need to play no more to connect. This would save a lot of money initially. You do not need more stadiums, no transport infrastructure: it is simply to gather every four years before the Aquarium of the House Kraken - even if it be in four years, not Paul, because Octopuses have only an average life expectancy of three years.
Maybe yes, the German team two days ago, the prediction of cephalopods taken too seriously, just because some prophecies tend to be fulfilling itself. Just when the self-confidence before a duel with an enemy that shows no obvious weaknesses, not too pronounced, wipes some people the "prediction" is not simply set aside, but the omen eats in mind may find and gnaw. I hope that it is not the Dutch, the day on Sunday was made like that!
But how to break the Spaniard? The key to the success of the Spaniards, in addition to the good ball skills above all the outstanding positional play. It makes the rooms close to the opponent, creating face-off stations for passports. The acclaimed as
Tiki Taka short passing game, I personally rather shenanigans because it actually barely space provides.
It has, however, the purpose of tiring the opponent and get the ball. If the opponent played only once tired, grown for the Spaniards finally opportunities.
There are several ways to counter this tactic: One is to provide a bus outside the gate. This means that all defend man, if need be, all on the line. This has done more or less to Switzerland. The
second option would in my view, the consistent man-marking in the midfield. The fact that the English are well cast there must not be mentioned. This is public property. But this variation is apparently no longer acceptable. The German team, the man coverage more than any other team practiced (with the possible exception of the Greeks), took to Spain at least not to this medium. Why?
The man-marking is one of several tools that are in the tactical toolbox of football coaches. It is used by top teams, especially because of a very few more, because the man coverage makes it difficult to transition from defense to attack. Let's say, a right-back is assigned to a particular striker, who normally acts on the left wing of his team. In order to avoid his direct opponent, called the winger soaked in the middle or on his right wing (our right-back will therefore be forced to follow his opponent and is now available on "his" left wing). Now conquering the previously defending team takes the ball, then the ball carrier to his comrades not where he expected because he's followed his opposite wing to that to which it does not belong.
This disadvantage of man coverage is easy. But when it comes (and it must be against a team such as Spain have absolute priority), not to let them come to their short passing game, then there is little alternative but any English player to stand on their feet. This eliminates the ball carrier of the Spaniards the possible face-off stations, they have to walk longer distances and the order in midfield could be broken by this. In the game is more exercise. Does it perhaps via fast winger, then chances are quite possible.
I do not know if this approach was ever considered in practice. FIFA fine spirits as the authors of the "Süddeutsche Zeitung" will shake here probably but yes immediately condemn any action as a medieval or junk, when it comes to the defensive. Since then it say before, Podolski had "a medieval
Libero " saved against Ramos. Should he do it because not even let him prefer to allow the clean sheet? The man has just cover it justified when playing against a team that is playful and technically superior. Refrain from this tool from the start, so, banish it completely from the tactical tool kit, is a bit arrogant. If you want to prevent an absolute dominance of the Spaniards, they could very well be a valuable means to an end.
see if the Dutch are as less dogmatic Jogi Loew as. They describe their style, according to Nigel de Jong this by now as "more German than the Germans." This may give cause for hope ...
Addendum: With this opinion I am not alone. See this forum topic
Mirror: Guckst you!